Tip: Speaking Task 5: pick one option and stay with it. Comparing both is fine, switching sides isn't.
Determine the author's personal opinion versus the viewpoints they are reporting.
Welcome to Reading Part 4. You have 13 minutes to read a complex, dense academic article and answer questions. To achieve a CLB 9+, you must understand that the author of this article is almost never neutral.
Your first and most important task is to identify the Author's Stance. If you misunderstand their hidden bias, you will fail the "Main Idea" questions.
In CELPIP Part 4, the text is usually an opinion editorial (Op-Ed). The author is trying to convince the reader of a specific viewpoint (e.g., Universal Basic Income is good). However, to appear professional, they will spend 50% of the article discussing why the opposing viewpoint might be valid.
[!WARNING]
The Neutrality Trap: Because the author discusses both the PROs and CONs, test-takers assume the author is neutral. This is the biggest trap in Part 4. The author always picks a side by the final paragraph. You must look past their objective tone and find the subjective conclusion.
Because the article discusses a debate, you must structure your reading to reflect the two sides of the argument. Bring back the T-Chart!
How to Beat It:
During your initial 60-second Skim, draw a T-Chart on your scratch paper. Label the left side "PRO" and the right side "CON".
As you skim, force the paragraphs into the columns.
Questions regarding the author's stance look like this:
How to Beat It:
Ignore the middle of the text! The author's true stance is almost always located in the final 2 sentences of the entire article.
Look for strong, evaluative words in the conclusion:
The multiple-choice answers will use high-level adjectives to describe the author's tone.
| Vocabulary Word in Answer | What it Means | Clues in the Text |
|---|---|---|
| "Skeptical" | The author doubts it will work. | Look for words like Unlikely, Doubtful, Unproven. |
| "Optimistic" | The author believes it will succeed. | Look for words like Promising, Hopeful, Beneficial. |
| "Critical" | The author hates the idea. | Look for words like Flawed, Detrimental, Dangerous. |
| "Objective" | The author is truly neutral (Rare!). | The author offers zero opinions, only raw data. |
Train your brain to find the hidden bias:
You have identified the author's bias. Now, we must analyze the chaotic debate happening within the text itself in Part 4: Analyzing Conflicting Opinions.