Tip: Speaking Task 5: pick one option and stay with it. Comparing both is fine, switching sides isn't.
Improve your ability to recognize synonyms and paraphrased information.
In Reading Part 4, reading the dense academic article is only half the battle. Below the article, you will find a "Reader's Comment"—a short response written by a member of the public reacting to the main article.
The final 5 questions of the Reading test are fill-in-the-blank dropdown menus located inside this reader's comment. To achieve a CLB 9+, you must instantly identify where this new speaker stands on the battlefield you mapped out in Chapter 13.
The person writing the comment is not a neutral journalist. They are a passionate citizen. They read the article, got fired up, and decided to write a response.
[!WARNING]
The Sarcasm Trap: Because the commenter is passionate, they often use sarcasm or irony. They might say, "Oh, what a brilliant idea to raise our taxes again!" If you take this literally, you will choose positive words in the dropdown menus. You must recognize that they are actually furious.
The commenter will always take one of three distinct stances. If you can identify their stance in the first sentence, the dropdown menu answers become incredibly obvious.
| The Stance | What it Means | What Dropdown Words to Choose |
|---|---|---|
| The Ally (Total Agreement) | They agree with the author's conclusion completely. | Look for words like Support, Validate, Agree, Excellent. |
| The Enemy (Total Disagreement) | They hate the author's conclusion and think the article is biased. | Look for words like Flawed, Ridiculous, Disagree, Harmful. |
| The Nuanced Critic (Partial Agreement) | They agree with the premise, but disagree with the proposed solution. | Look for words like However, Unrealistic, Alternative, Compromise. |
The fill-in-the-blank questions in the comment section are designed to test if you can connect the commenter's feelings to the specific facts mentioned in the main article.
How to Beat It:
Use the "Echo" Technique. The commenter will rarely repeat the exact words from the main article; they will echo the concepts.
How to solve: The commenter says "cannot believe", indicating they are angry (The Enemy stance). Therefore, the $5 billion cost is an "Echo" of a negative concept. The answer must be Burden.
Commenters use strong, evaluative adjectives to judge the main article.
| Vocabulary Term | The Commenter's Meaning | Their Stance |
|---|---|---|
| "Short-sighted" | The plan might work now, but will fail in the future. | Enemy / Nuanced Critic |
| "Overdue" | This should have happened a long time ago. | Ally |
| "Absurd" / "Ludicrous" | Completely ridiculous and illogical. | Enemy |
| "Valid point" | Acknowledging a truth before arguing against it. | Nuanced Critic |
| "Commendable" | Deserving praise. | Ally |
Train your brain to decode the passion of the public:
You understand the article and the comment. Now, in the final chapter of the Reading Masterclass, we learn how to survive the most difficult questions on the entire exam: Part 4: Synthesizing the Complete Argument.